Article 6 (1) [CRIMINAL]    6 (2)à

Article 6—Right to a fair trial

1.      In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

(...)

ARTICLE 6 (1) [CIVIL] ð

 

Oppdatert til og med oktober 2004

Nøkkelord:
 

APPLICABILITY

CRIMINAL CHARGE

DETERMINATION

ACCESS TO COURT

FAIR HEARING / FAIR TRIAL

ADVERSARIAL PROCEEDINGS

EQUALITY OF ARMS

PUBLIC HEARING

ORAL HEARING

REASONABLE TIME

INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL

IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL

INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL

TRIBUNAL ESTABLISHED BY LAW

a

 

APPLICABILITY    á

EZEH and CONNORS v. United Kingdom (Nº 39665/98 and Nº 40086/98)
Judgment 9.10.2003 [Grand Chamber]

 
Applicability of Article 6 to prison disciplinary proceedings:  Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MOREL v. France (N° 54559/00)
Decision 3.6.2003 [Section II]

 
Applicability of Article 6 to a 10% tax adjustment:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MONTCORNET DE CAUMONT v. France (Nº 59290/00)
Decision 13.5.2003 [Section II]

Proceedings concerning a request for amnesty: 
Article 6 not applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

FISCHER v. Austria (Nº 27569/02)
Decision 6.5.2003 [Section I]

Application for re-trial following ruling of European Court of Human Rights: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

KORELLIS v. Cyprus (Nº 54528/00)
Judgment 7.1.2003 [Section II]

 
Interlocutory proceedings:  Article 6 inapplicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CALDAS RAMIREZ DE ARRELLANO v. Spain (N° 68874/01)
Decision 28.1.2003 [Section IV]
Constitutional Court proceedings: 
Article 6 applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 MIEG DE BOOFZHEIM v. France (N° 52938/99)
Decision 3.12.2002 [Section II]

Relief granted in the course of tax proceedings from penalties imposed for bad faith: 
Article 6  not applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

JANOSEVIC v. Sweden (Nº 34619/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
  
Tax surcharges:  Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

VÄSTBERGA TAXI AKTIEBOLAG and VULIC v. Sweden (Nº 36985/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]

  
Tax surcharges:  Article 6 applicable.
This judgment deals with the same issue as the Janosevic judgment, above..
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 
 

MONTERA v. Italy (N° 64713/01)
Decision 9.7.2002 [Section I]

Proceedings before a parliamentary committee: 
Article 6 not applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (
fransk)

 

BUTLER v. United Kingdom (N° 41661/98)
Decision 27.6.2002  [Section III]

 
Forfeiture order allegedly amounting to a criminal charge:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PEÑAFIEL SALGADO v. Spain  (N° 65964/01)
Decision 16.4.2002  [Section IV]

Inapplicability of Article 6 to extradition proceedings.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

RIELA and Others v. Italy (N° 52439/99)
Decision 4.9.2001 [Section I]
 
Proceedings concerning the application under Italian law of preventive measures involving the confiscation of property: Article 6 not applicable (under its criminal head).
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

JOÃO JOSÉ BRANDÃO FERREIRA v. Portugal  (N° 41921/98)
Decision 28.9.2000  [Section IV]

Military disciplinary proceedings : 
Article 6 not applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

AYDIN v. Turkey (N° 41954/98)
Decision 14.9.2000  [Section II]

 
Principle of multiplicity of sentences:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BATUR v. Turkey (N° 38604/97)
ERBEK v. Turkey (N° 38923/97)

DURAN ET AL v. Turkey (N° 38925/97)

A.R.T.  v. Turkey (N° 39830/98)
A.Ö v. Turkey (N° 40276/98)
GOKDEN ET KARACOL v. Turkey (N° 40535/98)
KAPLAN and KARACA v. Turkey (N° 40536/98)
Y.G.  v. Turkey (N° 40688/98)

M.D.  v. Turkey (N° 40689/98)
DURGUN v. Turkey (N° 40751/98)
EREZ v. Turkey (N° 40752/98)
DENDEN ET AL v. Turkey (N° 40754/98)
YILDIRIM v. Turkey (N° 40800/98)
GULGONUL v. Turkey (N° 40806/98)
ABUL v. Turkey (N° 40807/98)
DERE v. Turkey (N° 43916/98)

Decision 4.7.2000 [Section I]
Disciplinary proceedings concerning non-commissioned officers:  Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (
fransk):

(BATUR v. Turkey)
(ERBEK v. Turkey)
(DURAN ET AL v. Turkey
(A.R.T. v. Turkey)
(A.Ö. v. Turkey)
(
GOKDEN and KARACOL v. Turkey)
(KAPLAN and KARACA)
(Y.G. v. Turkey)
(
M.D. v. Turkey)
(
DURGUN v. Turkey)
(EREZ v. Turkey)
(
DENDEN and Others v. Turkey)
(YILDIRIM v. Turkey)
(
GULGONUL v. Turkey)
(ABUL v. Turkey)
(DERE v. Turkey)
 

 GAST and POPP v. Germany (Nº 29357/95)
Judgment 25.2.2000 [Section I]
Constitutional Court proceedings: 
Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GANTZNER v. France  (Nº 43604/98)
Decision 5.10.99  [Section III]

Appeal concerning amount of tax adjustment: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

CRIMINAL CHARGE    á

GUTFREUND v. France (N° 45681/99)
Judgment 12.6.2003 [Section III]

 
Request for legal aid for criminal proceedings:  Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

ANTOINE v. United Kingdom (Nº 62960/00)
Decision 13.05.2003 [Section IV]

 
Nature of proceedings instituted following establishment of unfitness to plead:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

YILDIRIM v. Italy (N° 38602/02)
Decision 10.4.2003 [Section I]

 
Proceedings involving the confiscation of a vehicle in connection with the criminal conviction of a third person who had used it unlawfully:  Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SADAY v. Turkey (N° 32458/96)
Decision 10.4.2003 [Section I]
Contempt of court proceedings for insulting judges: 
Article 6 applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PORTER v. United Kingdom (Nº 15814/02)
Decision 8.4.2003 [Section IV]

Order to pay a very large sum to local authority for loss caused by wilful misconduct in office: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

C.M. v. France (N° 28078/95)
Decision 26.6.2001 [Section III]

 
Procédure pénale contre un tiers pour infraction commise avec le véhicule du requérant lui-même non poursuivi : irrecevable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

INOCÊNCIO v. Portugal (N° 43862/98)
Decision 11.1.2001 [Section IV]

Pecuniary sanction for works carried out on a house without the required permit:
Article 6 not applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BLOKKER v. Netherlands  (N° 45282/99)
Decision7.11.2000  [Section I]

Obligation for persons found to have driven under the influence of alcohol to undergo a course at their own expense: 
Article 6 inapplicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

T. v. Austria (N˚ 27783/95)
Judgment 14.11.2000 [Section III]

Imposition of fine for abuse of process: 
Article 6 applicable.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE SAINT-RAPHAEL ET DE FREJUS and others v. France (N° 45053/98)
Decision 29.2.2000  [Section III]

 
Appeals lodged by association to challenge building permits:  Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

ESCOUBET v. Belgium (Nº 26780/95)
Judgment 28.10.99 [Grand Chamber]

 
Temporary withdrawal of driving licence following accident:  Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

NINN-HANSEN v. Denmark (Nº 28972/95)
Decision 18.5.99  [Section II]

 
Proceedings before a court of inquiry, with the role of giving an opinion enabling Parliament to decide whether to institute proceedings against a former minister:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BROWN v. United Kingdom  (No 38644/97)
Decision 24.11.98  [Section III]
Disciplinary fine:  inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PADIN GESTOSO v. Spain (No 39519/98)
Decision 8.12.98  [Section IV]

Concept of criminal charge – investigative measures prior to the bringing of charges:  inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

DETERMINATION    á

 WITHEY v. United Kingdom (Nº 59493/00)
Decision 26.8.2003 [Section IV]

Court order leaving charges on file: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

ACCESS TO COURT    á

MAILLET v. France (N˚ 45676/99)
Decision 12.11.2002 [Section IV]

Refusal to admit appeal memorial on account of absence of signature of appellant who had chosen not to be represented by a lawyer practising before the supreme courts: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PAPON v. France (N° 54210/00)
Judgment 25.7.2002 [Section I]

Dismissal of cassation appeal due to appellant’s failure to surrender into custody: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

JANOSEVIC v. Sweden (Nº 34619/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
Enforcement of tax surcharges prior to court determination of liability: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

VÄSTBERGA TAXI AKTIEBOLAG and VULIC v. Sweden (Nº 36985/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]

Enforcement of tax surcharges prior to court determination of liability: 
violation.

This judgment deals with the same issue as the Janosevic judgment, above..
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GÖKTAN v. France (N° 33402/96)
Judgment 2.7.2002 [Section II]

Lack of competence of judge to assess the length of civil imprisonment for a customs debt: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

R.D. v. Poland (Nº 29692/96 and Nº 34612/97)
Judgment 18.12.2001 [Section IV]

Refusal to appoint legal aid lawyer for cassation appeal:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ELIAZER v. the Netherlands (Nº 38055/97)
Judgment 16.10.2001 [Section I]
Exclusion of cassation appeal following conviction in absentia in Netherlands Antilles: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MAUER v. Austria (no. 2) (N˚ 35401/97)
Judgment 20.6.2000 [Section III]
Administrative criminal proceedings: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

VAN PELT v. France  (N° 31070/96)
Judgment 23.5.2000  [Section III]

Dismissal of cassation appeal due to appellant's failure to comply with arrest warrant: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

J.K. v. Slovakia (N˚ 29021/95)
Judgment 21.3.2000 [Section II]

 
Absence of possibility of court review of conviction by administrative authorities for minor offence:  friendly settlement.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

KHALFAOUI v. France  (Nº 34791/97)
Judgment 14.12.99  [Section III]

Dismissal of cassation appeal due to appellant's failure to surrender into custody: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MILLAN I TORNES v. Andorra  (No 35052/97)
Judgment 6.7.99  [Section I]

Authorisation of the State prosecution service to initiate appeal proceedings: 
settlement between parties
.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MOHR v. Luxembourg  (N° 29236/95)
Decision 20.4.99 [Section II]

Lodging of a memorial by the applicant's lawyer, mentioning that it concerned the cassation appeal against the judgment in the applicant's case, but without expressly stating that it was lodged on behalf of and for the applicant: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

RIGHT TO A COURT    á

ASSANIDZÉ - Georgia (N° 71503/01)
Judgment 8.4.2004 [Grand Chamber] – Nº 63
Refusal to release detainee following final acquittal : 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

FAIR HEARING / FAIR TRIAL    á

EDWARDS and LEWIS - United Kingdom (Nº 39647/98 and Nº 40461/98)
Judgment 27.10.2004 [Grand Chamber] - Nº 68
Non-disclosure by prosecution, on ground of public interest, of material potentially relevant to defence of entrapment:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MAKHFI - France (N° 59335/00)
Judgment 19.10.2004  [Section II] - Nº 68
Length of oral pleadings before a criminal court :  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)

EUROFINACOM - France (N° 58753/00)
Decision 7.9.2004  [Section II] - Nº 67
Alleged incitement by the police to commit an offence:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

S.C. v. United Kingdom (Nº 60958/00)
Judgment 15.6.2004  [Section IV]

Fitness of an eleven year old boy to plead and stand trial:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CORNELIS v. Netherlands (N° 994/03)
Decision 25.5.2004 [Section II]

Conviction partly based on statements by co-accused who made an arrangement with the prosecution: 
inadmissible
.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SOMOGYI v. Italy (N° 67972/01)
Judgment 18.5.2004 [Section II]

Alleged failure to inform accused of proceedings prior to conviction in absentiaviolation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WEH v. Austria (N° 38544/97)
Judgment 8.4.2004 [Section I]

Imposition of a fine to a registered car owner who refused to disclose the name of the person who had driven his car:  no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SHANNON v. United Kingdom (N° 67537/01)
Decision 6.4.2004 [Section IV] – Nº 63
Admission in trial of evidence obtained with entrapment by a journalist:  inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

JONES v. United Kingdom (N° 30900/02)
Decision 9.9.2003 [Section IV]

Trial and conviction in the absence of the accused and his legal representatives: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SIGURÞÓR ARNARSSON v. Iceland (Nº 44671/98)
Judgment 15.7.2003 [Section II]

Conviction on appeal by prosecution, on the basis of an assessment of the evidence by the Supreme Court, without hearing the accused in person: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

EDWARDS and LEWIS v. United Kingdom (Nº 39647/98 and Nº 40461/98)
Judgment 22.7.2003 [Section IV]

Non-disclosure by prosecution, on ground of public interest, of material potentially relevant to defence of entrapment: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GARAUDY v. France  (N° 65831/01)
Decision 24.6.2003 [Section IV]

Refusal to join five parallel sets of proceedings before the same court: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SOFRI and others v. Italy (Nº 37235/97)
Decision 27.5.2003 [Section IV]

 
Loss and destruction of evidence:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SEQUEIRA v. Portugal (Nº 73557/01)
Decision 6.5.2003 [Section III]

Alleged incitement by agents provocateurs to commit a crime: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

PERNA v. Italy (Nº 48898/99)
Judgment 6.5.2003 [Grand Chamber]

Refusal to admit evidence requested by the accused in a defamation case: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PAPAGEORGIOU v. Greece (Nº 59506/00)
Judgment 9.5.2003 [Section I]

Refusal to allow evidence requested by an accused: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SELVANAYAGAM v. United Kingdom (Nº 57981/00)
Decision 12.12.2002 [Section III]

 
Refusal to allow plea of defence of reasonable conduct, on account of breach of injunction: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CRAXI v. Italy (N° 34896/97)
Judgment 5.12.2002 [Section I]
Effect of press campaign on judges in trial of politician: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ALLAN v. United Kingdom (Nº 48539/99)
Judgment 5.11.2002 [Section IV]

Self-incrimination – eliciting of confession by police informer placed in suspect’s cell: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WYNEN v. Belgium (N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002 [Section II]

–Notification of Court of Cassation hearing by announcement at its registry: 
no violation.
–Refusal of Court of Cassation to put preliminary question to Court of Arbitration:  no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BECKLES v. United Kingdom (Nº 44652/98)
Judgment 8.10.2002 [Section IV]

Drawing of adverse inferences by a jury from accused’s failure to reply to police questions: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ALLEN v. United Kingdom  (Nº 76574/01)
Decision 10.9.2002 [Section IV]

Self-incrimination:  obligation to disclose information to tax authorities: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PERRY v. United Kingdom  (Nº 63737/00)
Decision 26.9.2002 [Section III]

 
Admission as evidence in criminal proceedings of video footage taken without accused’s knowledge or consent: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

CHALKLEY v. United Kingdom (Nº 63831/00)
Decision 26.9.2002 [Section III]

 
Admission as evidence in criminal proceedings of evidence obtained through use of a listening device illegally installed in the suspect’s home:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PARRIS v. Cyprus (N° 56354/00)
Decision 4.7.2002  [Section I]

 
Conviction for manslaughter on basis of autopsy carried out illegally:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CALABRO v. Italy (N° 59895/00)
Decision 21.3.2002 [Section I]

 
Undercover agent who did not incite the commission of the offence, although it would not have taken place without his intervention:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

OYSTON v. United Kingdom  (N° 42011/98)
Decision 22.1.2002  [Section IV]

 
Fresh evidence adduced by defendant in rape case refused by Court of Appeal:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

TURQUIN v. France  (N° 43467/98)
Decision 24.1.2002 [Section IV]

 
Use at trial of private recordings made without the knowledge of the accused:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

C.G. v. the United Kingdom (Nº 43373/98)
Judgment 19.12.2001 [Section III]

Frequent interruptions by judge during trial:
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 PAPON v. France (N° 54210/00)
Decision 15.11.2001 [Section III]

–Effects of a media campaign on the fairness of the jury trial of a former Minister:
inadmissible.
–Absence of reasons for jury’s verdict in criminal trial: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

EINHORN v. France (N° 71555/01)
Decision 16.10.2001 [Section III]

–Extradition of applicant to the United States, where he claims the members of the jury which will retry him have been subjected to a virulent media campaign:
inadmissible.
–Extradition of applicant to the United States, where he had been convicted in absentia, following adoption of a US law allowing for the possibility of retrial: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

G.B. v. France (N° 44069/98)
Judgment 2.10.2001 [Section III]

Refusal of Court of Assize to order counter-expertise requested by applicant following expert’s unfavourable change of position:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom (Nº 44787/98)
Judgment 25.9.2001 [Section III]

–Non-disclosure, on ground of public interest immunity, of material held by prosecution:
no violation.
Use in criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Convention: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PHILLIPS v. the United Kingdom  (Nº 41087/98)
Judgment 5.7.2001 [Section III]

 
Confiscation order based on presumption that assets acquired through drug trafficking: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SAWONIUK v. the United Kingdom (N° 63716/00)
Decision 29.5.2001 [Section III]

Trial concerning war crimes taking place fifty years after the events:
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

J.B. v. Switzerland (Nº 31827/96)
Judgment 3.5.2001 [Section II]

 
Self-incrimination – obligation to submit documents to the tax authorities: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

YANG CHUN JIN alias YANG XIAOLIN v. Hungary (Nº 58073/00)
Judgment 8.3.2001 [Section II]

 
Threatened extradition to China, with alleged risk of summary trial: struck out.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

VAUDELLE v. France (N° 35683/97)
Judgment 30.1.2001 [Section III]

Conviction in absentia of accused, placed under supervisory guardianship, without notification to the guardian and without any legal representation at the hearing:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HEANEY and McGUINNESS v. Ireland (Nº 34720/97)
QUINN v. Ireland (Nº 36887/97)

Judgments 21.12.2000  [Section IV]

 
Self-incrimination – conviction for refusing to answer questions asked by the police:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(HEANEY and McGUINNESS v. Ireland)
(QUINN v. Ireland)
 

I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P. v. United Kingdom  (N˚ 29522/95, 30056/96 and 30574/96)
Judgment 19.9.2000 [Section III]

Self-incrimination – use at trial of statements made on pain of a sanction to inspectors investigating a company takeover: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PULLICINO v. Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000  [Section II]

 
–Effect of extensive adverse media reporting on fairness of trial:  inadmissible.
–Fairness of proceedings as a whole despite breach of the right to a fair hearing: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

COEME v. Belgium  (Nº 32492/96)
MAZY v. Belgium  (Nº 32547/96)
STALPORT v. Belgium  (Nº 32548/96)
HERMANUS v. Belgium  (Nº 33209/96)
JAVEAU v. Belgium  (Nº 33210/96)
Judgment 22.6.2000  [Section II]

 
Absence of legal basis for special procedure:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

AVERILL v. United Kingdom (N˚ 36408/97)
Judgment 6.6.2000 [Section III]

Self-incrimination - drawing of adverse inferences from accused’s silence: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

UBACH MORTES v. Andorra  (N° 46253/99)
Decision 4.5.2000  [Section IV]

 
Allegations of unfair proceedings relating to misappropriation of public funds:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CONDRON v. United Kingdom  (N˚ 35718/97)
Judgment 2.5.2000 [Section III]

Self-incrimination - drawing of adverse inferences by a jury: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SERVES v. France  (N° 38642/97)
Decision 4.5.2000  [Section III]

Self-incrimination - reports drafted in disciplinary proceedings used in subsequent criminal proceedings concerning the same facts: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

NATELITIĆ v. Croatia (N° 51891/99)
Decision 4.5.2000  [Section IV]

 
Surrender to the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia of person suspected of war crimes:  inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

KHAN v. United Kingdom (N˚ 35394/97)
Judgment 12.5.2000 [Section III]

Use in criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Convention: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HASER v. Switzerland (N° 33050/96)
Decision 27.4.2000  [Section II]

Obligation to contest a judgment given in default, in order to obtain a judgment in adversarial proceedings before lodging a cassation appeal: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 CAMILLERI v. Malta (N° 51760/99)
Decision 16.3.2000  [Section II]

Admission in evidence at trial of adverse statement revoked by witness before the trial: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ROWE and DAVIS v. United Kingdom (Nº 28901/95)
FITT v. United Kingdom (Nº 29777/96)
JASPER v. United Kingdom (Nº 27052/95)
Judgments 16.2.2000 [Grand Chamber]

Non-disclosure by prosecution on grounds of public interest immunity: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(ROWE and DAVIS v. United Kingdom)
(FITT v. United Kingdom)

(JASPER v. United Kingdom)
 

T. v. United Kingdom (Nº 24724/94)
V. v. United Kingdom (Nº 24888/94)

Judgments 16.12.99 [Grand Chamber]

 
Effective participation of child in trial:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(T. v. United Kingdom)
(V. v. United Kingdom)

a

 

ADVERSARIAL PROCEEDINGS    á

RIHA v. France (N° 71443/01)
Decision 24.6.2004 [Section III] - Nº 65

Quashing of appeal judgment by Court of Cassation and giving of final decision on the case without further pleading: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

DOWSETT v. United Kingdom (Nº 39482/98)
Judgment 24.6.2003 [Section II]

Non-disclosure of material by prosecution: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BERGER v. France (N° 48221/99)
Judgment 3.12.2002 [Section II]

Non-disclosure to party’s lawyer of report of judge rapporteur at the Court of Cassation: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WYNEN v. Belgique/Belgium (N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002 [Section II]

Alleged absence of opportunity to respond to submissions of public prosecutor: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MEFTAH and others v. France (N° 32911/96)
Judgment 26.7.2002 [Grand Chamber]
Non-communication des conclusions de l’avocat général près la Cour de cassation et impossibilité d’y répliquer par écrit :
violation
.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

EQUALITY OF ARMS    á

MAKHFI - France (N° 59335/00)
Judgment 19.10.2004 [Section II] - Nº 68

Length of oral pleadings before a criminal court :  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)

MAGNUSSON v. Sweden (Nº 53972/00)
Decision 16.12.2003 [Section IV]

Reliance on video recording of children’s evidence in conviction for sexual abuse:
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WYNEN v.  Belgium (N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002 [Section II]

Rejection as out of time of supplementary memorial lodged by appellant with Court of Cassation: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ATLAN v. the United Kingdom (Nº 36533/97)
Judgment 19.6.2001 [Section III]

Non-disclosure of material by the prosecution:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BEER v. Austria (Nº 30428/96)
Judgment 6.2.2001 [Section III]

Non-communication of appeal in respect of costs:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PULLICINO v. Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000  [Section II]

Confiscation of notes taken by the defence during the prosecution’s presentation of its case: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

KUOPILA v. Finland (N˚ 27752/95)
Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section IV]

Non-disclosure to accused of material submitted to court by prosecution: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

VOISINE v. France  (N°27362/65)
Judgment 8.2.2000  [Section III]
Non-communication des conclusions de l’avocat général près la Cour de cassation : 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

PUBLIC HEARING    á

RIEPAN v. Austria (N° 35115/97)
Judgment 15.6.2000  [Section III]

Hearing held in prison: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a

 

ORAL HEARING    á

 MEFTAH and others v. France (N° 32911/96)
Judgment 26.7.2002 [Grand Chamber]

Absence of possibility of addressing Court of Cassation orally at hearing, either personally or through a lawyer without rights of audience before the supreme courts: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 TIERCE and others v. San Marino  (N° 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000  [Section I]

Absence of oral hearing on appeal: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CONSTANTINESCU v. Romania (N˚ 28871/95)
Judgment 27.6.2000 [Section I]

Absence of oral hearing on appeal: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

STEFANELLI v. San-Marino  (N° 35396/97)
Judgment 8.2.2000  [Section II]

Lack of oral hearing before the trial judge: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a
 

REASONABLE TIME    á

 SCHUMACHER v. Luxembourg (N° 63286/00)
Judgment 25.11.2003 [Section IV]

Length of investigation ending in time-bar – dies a quem with regard to the period to be examined.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WITHEY v. United Kingdom (Nº 59493/00)
Decision 26.8.2003 [Section IV]

Court order leaving charges on file: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PEDERSEN and BAADSGAARD v. Denmark (Nº 49017/99)
Judgment 19.6.2003 [Section I]

Length of criminal proceedings: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SCHAAL v. Luxembourg  (N° 51773/99)
Judgment 18.2.2003 [Section IV]

Length of criminal proceedings having repercussions on a parent’s right of access to his child: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ETCHEVESTE and BIDART v. France  (N° 44797/98 and N° 44798/98)
Judgment 21.3.2002  [Section I]

Starting point of period to be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length of criminal proceedings.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WEJRUP v. Denmark (N° 49126/99)
Decision 7.3.2002  [Section I]
Allegedly excessive length of proceedings concerning fraud, due to the joinder of the cases against several defendants: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HENDRIKS v. Netherlands  (N° 44829/98)
Decision 5.3.2002  [Section II]

Authorities not responsible for delays in criminal proceedings having taken place in other countries in respect of the same facts: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MARTINS and GARCIA ALVES v. Portugal (N° 37528/97)
Judgment 16.11.2000  [Section IV]

Starting point – date of interrogation by police: 
violation
.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

KUDŁA v. Poland (N˚ 30210/96)
Judgment 26.10.2000 [Grand Chamber]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

WŁOCH v. Poland (N˚ 27785/95)
Judgment 19.10.2000 [Section IV]

Length of criminal proceedings – delays attributable to foreign authorities: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GEORGIOS STRAVORAVDIS v. Greece (N° 45140/98)
Decision 12.10.00  [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings : 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GRAUSLYS v. Lithuania (N˚ 36743/97)
Judgment 10.10.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

LÖFFLER v. Austria (N˚ 30546/96)
Judgment 3.10.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings – starting point where proceedings reopened.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HOWARTH v. United Kingdom (N˚ 38081/97)
Judgment 21.9.2000 [Section IV]

Length of criminal proceedings – delay between original non-custodial sentence and custodial sentence ordered following reference by Attorney-General: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BERTIN v. MOUROT v. France (N° 36343/97)
 Judgment 2.8.2000  [Section III]

–Length of criminal proceedings – starting point of the period to be taken into account.
–Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

IKANGA v. France (N˚ 32675/96)
Judgment 2.8.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CHERAKRAK v. France (N˚ 34075/96)
Judgment 2.8.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

P.B. v. France (N˚ 38781/97)
Judgment 1.8.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

C.P. and others v. France  (N° 36009/97)
Judgment 1.8.2000  [Section III]
Length of criminal proceedings:  no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BARFUSS v. Czech Republic (N˚ 35848/97)
Judgment 31.7.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MATTOCCIA v. Italy (N˚ 23969/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000 [Section I]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HANSEN v. Denmark (N˚ 28971/95)
Judgment 11.7.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GROSSE v. Denmark (N˚ 30285/96)
Judgment 8.6.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

STARACE v. Italy (N° 34081/96)
Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PEPE v. Italy (N° 30132/96)
Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PUNZELT v. Czech Republic (N˚ 31315/96)
Judgment 25.4.2000 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SERGI v.  Italy (N˚ 37118/97)
Judgment 11.4.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

BOCCARDI v.  Italy (N˚ 38045/97)
Judgment 28.3.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MARAZZO v. Italy  (N˚ 41203/98)
Judgment 28.3.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

CLOEZ v. France (Nº 41861/98)
Judgment 14.3.2000 [Section III]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GALLONI v. Italy (Nº 39453/98)
Judgment 29.2.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

AGGIATO v. Italy (Nº 36822/97)
Judgment 29.2.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

GAST and POPP v. Germany (Nº 29357/95)
Judgment 25.2.2000 [Section I]
Length of Constitutional Court proceedings: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MAJARIC v. Slovenia (Nº 28400/95)
Judgment 8.2.2000 [Section I]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

AGGA v. Greece (Nº 37439/97)
Judgment 25.1.2000 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PALMIGIANO v. Italy (Nº 37507/97)
Judgment 11.1.2000 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MARTINELLI v. Italy (Nº 33827/96)
Judgment 11.1.2000 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

DE BLASIIS v. Italy (Nº 33969/96)
Judgment 14.12.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z. v. Italy (Nº 41603/98)
Judgment 14.12.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 PENNA v. Italy (Nº 35168/97)
MASTROENI v. Italy (Nº 41041/98)
M.R. v. Italy (Nº 41892/98)

LOMBARDO v. Italy (Nº 42353/98)
Judgments 14.12.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(PENNA v. Italy)
(MASTROENI v. Italy)
(M.R. v. Italy)
(LOMBARDO v. Italy)
 

MARCHETTI v. Italy (Nº 37702/97)
Judgment 14.12.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

GATTO v. Italy (Nº 34469/97)
IULIANO v. Italy (Nº 35756/97)
ROSSI v. Italy (Nº 36148/97)
PASSADORO v. Italy (Nº 36740/97)
ALI v. Italy (Nº 37484/97)
ERRIGO v. Italy (Nº 39789/98)

Judgments 2.11.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(GATTO v. Italy)
(IULIANO v. Italy)
(ROSSI v. Italy)
(PASSADORO v. Italy)
(ALI v. Italy)
(ERRIGO v. Italy)
 

FRANZIL v. Italy (Nº 34214/96)
FERRARA and DE LORENZO v. Italy (Nº 40282/98 and Nº 40283/98)
Judgments 26.10.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(FRANZIL v. Italy)
(FERRARA and DE LORENZO v. Italy)
 

GELLI v. Italy (Nº 37752/97)
Judgment 19.10.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

G.S. v. Italy (Nº 34204/96)
EMMOLO v. Italy (Nº 42500/98)
SCANDELA v. Italy (Nº 43494/98)
MACCIOCCHI v. Italy (Nº 43584/98)
CARROZZA v. Italy (Nº 43598/98)

Judgments 19.10.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(G.S. v. Italy)
(EMMOLO v. Italy)
(SCANDELA v. Italy)
(MACCIOCCHI v. Italy)
(CARROZZA v. Italy)
 

DONSIMONI v. France (Nº 36754/97)
Judgment 5.10.99 [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SCARUFFI v. Italy (Nº 33455/96)
BAGEDDA and DELOGU v. Italy (Nº 33992/96)

PESONI v. Italy (Nº 39694/98)
MANGIOLA v. Italy (Nº 40179/98)

LA BROCCA and others v. Italy (Nº 40293/98 and 40295/98)
FRANCESCA v. Italy (Nº 40665/98)
SILVESTRI and others v. Italy (Nº 41327/98, 41328/98, 41329/98 and/et 41560/98)
Judgments 5.10.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(SCARUFFI v. Italy)
(BAGEDDA and DELOGU v. Italy)
(PESONI v. Italy)
(MANGIOLA v. Italy)
(LA BROCCA and others v. Italy)
(FRANCESCA v. Italy)
(SILVESTRI and others v. Italy)
 

DJAID v. France  (Nº 38687/97)
Judgment 29.9.99  [Section III]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

SACCOMANNO v. Italy (N° 36719/97)
Judgment 12.5.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

LEDONNE (Nº1) v. Italy  (Nº 35742/97)
Judgments 12.5.99 [Section II]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

LEDONNE (Nº2) v. Italy (Nº 38414/97)
Judgment 12.5.99 [Section II]
Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PELISSIER and SASSI v. France  (Nº 25444/94)
Judgment 25.3.99 [Grand Chamber]

Length of criminal proceedings:  violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a
 

INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL    á

SADAK and Others v. Turkey (Nº 29900/96, Nº 29901/96, Nº 29902/96 and Nº 29903/96)
Judgment 17.7.2001 [Section I]
Independence and impartiality of State Security Court:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PETERSEN v. Denmark (N˚ 24989/94)
Judgment 16.11.2000 [Section II]

Independence of deputy judge of Bailiff's Court: 
friendly settlement.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

T. v. United Kingdom (Nº 24724/94)
V. v. United Kingdom (Nº 24888/94)

Judgments 16.12.99 [Grand Chamber]

Fixing of minimum sentence by Executive: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(T. v. United Kingdom)
(V. v. United Kingdom)

 

MOORE and GORDON v. United Kingdom (Nº 36529/97 and Nº 37393/97)
SMITH and FORD v. United Kingdom  (Nº 37475/97 and Nº 39036/97)
Judgments 29.9.99  [Section III]

Independence and impartiality of courts-martial:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(MOORE and GORDON v. United Kingdom)
(SMITH and FORD v. United Kingdom )

 

GERGER v. Turkey (Nº 24919/94)
KARATAS v. Turkey (Nº 23168/94)
BASKAYA and OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey (Nº 23536/94 and Nº 24408/94)
OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey (Nº 24246/94)
SÜREK and ÖZDEMIR v. Turkey (Nº 23927/94 and Nº 24277/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 1)  (Nº 26682/95)
SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 2)  (Nº 24122/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 3)  (Nº 24735/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 4)  (Nº 24762/94)

Judgments 8.7.99  [Grand Chamber]

National Security Courts (Turkey): 
 violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(GERGER v. Turkey)
(KARATAS v. Turkey)
(BASKAYA and OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey)
(OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey)
(SÜREK and ÖZDEMIR v. Turkey)
(SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 1))
(SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 2))
(SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 3))
(SÜREK v. Turkey (no. 4))
 

CABLE and others v. United Kingdom  (Nos 24436/94, 24582/94, 24583/94, 24584/94, 24895/94, 25937/94, 25939/94, 25940/94, 25941/94, 26271/95, 26525/95, 27341/95, 27342/95, 27346/95, 27357/95, 27389/95, 27409/95, 27760/95, 27762/95, 27772/95, 28009/95, 28790/95, 30236/96, 30239/96, 30276/96, 30277/96, 30460/96, 30461/96, 30462/96, 31399/96, 31400/96, 31434/96, 31899/96, 32024/96, 32944/96)
Judgment 18.2.99 [Grand Chamber]
Independence and impartiality of courts-martial:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

HOOD v. United Kingdom  (Nº 27267/95)
Judgment18.2.99 [Grand Chamber]
Independence and impartiality of courts-martial:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a
 

IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL    á

CIANETTI v. Italy (Nº 55634/00)
Judgment 22.4.2004 [Section I]

Impartiality of trial judges who had previously participated in an appeal concerning temporary suspension of the accused from his post: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

DEPIETS v. France (N° 53971/00)
Judgment 10.2.2004 [Section II]

Judges dealing with appeal on points of law against conviction after having previously examined an appeal on points of law against the committal for trial: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

KYPRIANOU – Cyprus (N° 73797/01)
Judgment 27.1.2004 [Section II]

Conviction of lawyer for contempt of court by the same court before which the contempt took place: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc

 

CRAXI v. Italy (N° 34896/97)
Judgment 5.12.2002  [Section I]

Effect of press campaign on judges in trial of politician: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

LAVENTS v. Latvia (N° 58442/00)
Judgment 28.11.2002 [Section I]

Making of statements in press by judge dealing with case: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

DIDIER v. France  (No 58188/00)
Decision 27.8.2002  [Section II]

Participation of judge rapporteur in deliberations on the merits: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PEROTE PELLON v. Spain  (N° 45238/99)
Judgment 25.7.2002  [Section IV]

Impartiality of judges deciding on merits of case after having previously rejected appeals made by the accused at the investigation stage: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

 CRAXI v. Italy (N° 63226/00)
Decision 14.6.2001 [Section II]

–Impartiality of judges having dealt with similar cases:
inadmissible.
–Alleged lack of independence and impartiality of prosecution service: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PRIEBKE v. Italy (N° 48799/99)
Decision 5.4.2001 [Section II]

–Expression of views by public prosecutor during trial:
inadmissible.
–Participation by same presiding judge in decision concerning challenge to first instance judges and in decision on appeal on points of law: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

ROJAS MORALES v. Italy (N° 39676/98)
Judgment 16.11.2000  [Section II]

Conviction by court including two judges having already participated in a judgment concerning third parties in which reference was made to the accused's role in the criminal acts in question: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

DAKTARAS v. Lithuania (Nº 42095/98)
Judgment 10.10.2000  [Section III]

Judge lodging an appeal and appointing the judges that will decide upon it: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

TIERCE and others v. San Marino (N˚ 24954/94, 24971/94 et/and 24972/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000 [Section I]
Cumulation of functions – Commissario della Legge
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

PULLICINO v. Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000  [Section II]

Judge presiding over trial after having previously revoked bail: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GARRIDO GUERRERO v. Spain (N° 43715/98)
Decision 2.3.2000  [Section IV]

Impartiality of judge having previously participated in confirmation of indictment: 
inadmissible
.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MEDENICA v. Switzerland (N° 20491/92)
Decision 16.12.99 [Section II]

Statements by a member of a jury allegedly casting doubts on his impartiality:
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
 

SANDER v. United Kingdom (N˚ 34129/96)
Judgment 9.5.2000 [Section III]

 
Alleged racial prejudice of jurors:  violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

NINN-HANSEN v. Denmark (Nº 28972/95)
Decision 18.5.99  [Section II]

Impartiality of lay judges appointed by Parliament to sit on a court of impeachment: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a
 

INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL    á

COOPER v. United Kingdom (N° 48843/99)
Judgment 16.12.2003 [
Grand Chamber]
Independence and impartiality of Air Force court martial: 
no violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

GRIEVES v. United Kingdom (N° 57067/00)
Judgment 16.12.2003 [Grand Chamber
]

Independence and impartiality of Navy court martial: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

FILIPPINI v. San Marino (N° 10526/02)
Decision 26.8.2003 [Section II]

Appointment of judges by Parliament: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 ÖCALAN v. Turkey (N° 46221/99)
Judgment 12.3.2003 [Section I]

Independence and impartiality of a State Security Court – presence of a military judge throughout most of the trial: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ABSANDZE v. Georgia (N° 57861/00)
Decision 15.10.2002 [Section II]

Independence of Supreme Court judges: 
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

MORRIS v. United Kingdom (Nº 38784/97)
Judgment 26.2.2002 [Section III]

Independence and impartiality of court martial: 
violation

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

ŞAHINER v. Turkey (Nº 29279/95)
ARI v. Turkey (Nº 29281/95)
YILMAZ v. Turkey (Nº 29286/95)
KETENOĞLU v. Turkey (Nº 29360/95 and Nº 29361/95)
YILDIRIM v. Turkey (Nº 30451/96)
TAMKOÇ v. Turkey (Nº 31881/96)
YALGIN v. Turkey (Nº 31892/96)
GÜNEŞ v. Turkey (Nº 31893/96)
ŞAHIN v. Turkey (Nº 31961/96)
KIZILÖZ v. Turkey (Nº 32962/96)
FIKRET DOĞAN v. Turkey (Nº 33363/96)

YAKIŞ v. Turkey (Nº 33368/96)
YALGIN and Others v. Turkey (Nº 33370/96)

Judgments 25.9.2001 [Section I]

Independence and impartiality of martial law court:
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(ŞAHINER v. Turkey)
(ARI v. Turkey)
(YILMAZ v. Turkey)
(KETENOĞLU v. Turkey)
(YILDIRIM v. Turkey)
(TAMKOÇ v. Turkey)
(YALGIN v. Turkey)
(GÜNEŞ v. Turkey)
(ŞAHIN v. Turkey)
(KIZILÖZ v. Turkey)
(FIKRET DOĞAN v. Turkey)
(YAKIŞ v. Turkey)
(YALGIN and Others v. Turkey)
 

MORT v. the United Kingdom (N° 44564/98)
Decision 6.9.2001 [Section IV]

Role played by Clerk to the Justices in proceedings leading to imprisonment for failure to pay fine:
inadmissible.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a
 

TRIBUNAL ESTABLISHED BY LAW    á

POSOKHOV v. Russia (Nº 63486/00)
Judgment 4.3.2003 [Section II]

Non-compliance with rules on participation of lay judges in criminal trials: 
violation.

Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

 DIDIER v. France  (No 58188/00)
Decision 27.8.2002  [Section II]

Financial Markets Board allegedly not a “tribunal”: 
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

COEME v. Belgium  (Nº 32492/96)
MAZY v. Belgium  (Nº 32547/96)
STALPORT v. Belgium  (Nº 32548/96)
HERMANUS v. Belgium  (Nº 33209/96)
JAVEAU v. Belgium  (Nº 33210/96)
Judgment 22.6.2000  [Section II]

Special procedure for Ministers before the Court of Cassation applied to others: 
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
 

a