Article 6—Right to a fair trial 1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. (...) |
|
|
Oppdatert til og med oktober 2004
INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL
a
EZEH and CONNORS v. United Kingdom
(Nº
39665/98 and Nº 40086/98)
Judgment 9.10.2003 [Grand Chamber]
Applicability
of Article 6 to prison disciplinary proceedings:
Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MOREL v. France
(N° 54559/00)
Decision 3.6.2003
[Section II]
Applicability
of Article 6 to a 10% tax adjustment: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MONTCORNET DE CAUMONT v. France
(Nº 59290/00)
Decision 13.5.2003 [Section II]
Proceedings
concerning a request for amnesty: Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
FISCHER v. Austria (Nº 27569/02)
Decision 6.5.2003 [Section I]
Application for
re-trial following ruling of European Court of Human Rights:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
KORELLIS v. Cyprus (Nº 54528/00)
Judgment 7.1.2003 [Section II]
Interlocutory proceedings:
Article 6 inapplicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CALDAS RAMIREZ DE ARRELLANO v. Spain
(N° 68874/01)
Decision 28.1.2003 [Section IV]
Constitutional Court
proceedings: Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MIEG DE
BOOFZHEIM v. France
(N° 52938/99)
Decision
3.12.2002 [Section II]
Relief granted in the course of tax proceedings from penalties imposed for bad
faith: Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
JANOSEVIC v. Sweden (Nº 34619/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
Tax surcharges:
Article
6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
VÄSTBERGA TAXI AKTIEBOLAG
and VULIC v. Sweden (Nº 36985/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
Tax surcharges:
Article
6 applicable.
This judgment deals with the same issue as the
Janosevic judgment, above..
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MONTERA v. Italy
(N° 64713/01)
Decision 9.7.2002 [Section I]
Proceedings
before a parliamentary committee: Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
BUTLER v. United Kingdom
(N° 41661/98)
Decision 27.6.2002
[Section III]
Forfeiture
order allegedly amounting to a criminal charge: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PEÑAFIEL SALGADO v. Spain
(N° 65964/01)
Decision 16.4.2002 [Section IV]
Inapplicability
of Article 6 to extradition proceedings.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
RIELA and Others v. Italy
(N° 52439/99)
Decision 4.9.2001 [Section I]
Proceedings
concerning the application under Italian law of preventive measures involving
the confiscation of property: Article 6 not applicable (under its criminal
head).
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
JOÃO JOSÉ BRANDÃO
FERREIRA v. Portugal
(N° 41921/98)
Decision 28.9.2000 [Section IV]
Military
disciplinary proceedings : Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
AYDIN v. Turkey (N° 41954/98)
Decision 14.9.2000
[Section II]
Principle of
multiplicity of sentences: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BATUR v. Turkey (N°
38604/97)
ERBEK v. Turkey
(N° 38923/97)
DURAN ET AL v. Turkey
(N° 38925/97)
A.R.T. v.
Turkey
(N° 39830/98)
A.Ö v.
Turkey
(N° 40276/98)
GOKDEN ET KARACOL
v. Turkey
(N° 40535/98)
KAPLAN and KARACA v.
Turkey
(N° 40536/98)
Y.G. v.
Turkey
(N° 40688/98)
M.D. v. Turkey
(N° 40689/98)
DURGUN v. Turkey
(N° 40751/98)
EREZ v. Turkey
(N° 40752/98)
DENDEN ET AL v. Turkey
(N° 40754/98)
YILDIRIM v. Turkey
(N° 40800/98)
GULGONUL v. Turkey
(N° 40806/98)
ABUL v. Turkey
(N° 40807/98)
DERE v. Turkey
(N° 43916/98)
Decision 4.7.2000 [Section I]
Disciplinary
proceedings concerning non-commissioned officers:
Article 6 not
applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk):
(BATUR v. Turkey)
(ERBEK v. Turkey)
(DURAN ET AL v. Turkey
(A.R.T. v. Turkey)
(A.Ö. v. Turkey)
(GOKDEN and KARACOL v. Turkey)
(KAPLAN and KARACA)
(Y.G.
v. Turkey)
(M.D.
v. Turkey)
(DURGUN v. Turkey)
(EREZ v. Turkey)
(DENDEN and Others v. Turkey)
(YILDIRIM v. Turkey)
(GULGONUL v. Turkey)
(ABUL v. Turkey)
(DERE v. Turkey)
GAST and POPP
v. Germany
(Nº 29357/95)
Judgment 25.2.2000 [Section I]
Constitutional Court
proceedings: Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GANTZNER v. France
(Nº 43604/98)
Decision 5.10.99
[Section III]
Appeal
concerning amount of tax adjustment:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
GUTFREUND v. France
(N° 45681/99)
Judgment
12.6.2003 [Section III]
Request for
legal aid for criminal proceedings: Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ANTOINE v. United Kingdom
(Nº 62960/00)
Decision 13.05.2003 [Section IV]
Nature of
proceedings instituted following establishment of unfitness to plead:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
YILDIRIM v. Italy
(N° 38602/02)
Decision 10.4.2003 [Section I]
Proceedings
involving the confiscation of a vehicle in connection with the criminal
conviction of a third person who had used it unlawfully:
Article 6 not
applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SADAY v. Turkey
(N° 32458/96)
Decision 10.4.2003 [Section I]
Contempt of
court proceedings for insulting judges:
Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PORTER v. United Kingdom
(Nº 15814/02)
Decision 8.4.2003 [Section IV]
Order to pay a
very large sum to local authority for loss caused by wilful misconduct in
office: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
C.M. v. France
(N° 28078/95)
Decision 26.6.2001 [Section III]
Procédure pénale contre un
tiers pour infraction commise avec le véhicule du requérant lui-même non
poursuivi : irrecevable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
INOCÊNCIO v. Portugal
(N° 43862/98)
Decision 11.1.2001 [Section IV]
Pecuniary
sanction for works carried out on a house without the required permit:
Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BLOKKER v. Netherlands
(N° 45282/99)
Decision7.11.2000 [Section I]
Obligation for
persons found to have driven under the influence of alcohol to undergo a course
at their own expense: Article 6 inapplicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
T. v. Austria (N˚ 27783/95)
Judgment 14.11.2000 [Section III]
Imposition of fine for abuse of process:
Article 6 applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE
SAINT-RAPHAEL ET DE FREJUS and others v. France
(N° 45053/98)
Decision 29.2.2000
[Section III]
Appeals lodged
by association to challenge building permits: Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ESCOUBET v. Belgium
(Nº 26780/95)
Judgment 28.10.99
[Grand Chamber]
Temporary
withdrawal of driving licence following accident:
Article 6 not applicable.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
NINN-HANSEN v. Denmark (Nº 28972/95)
Decision 18.5.99
[Section II]
Proceedings
before a court of inquiry, with the role of giving an opinion enabling
Parliament to decide whether to institute proceedings against a former
minister: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BROWN v. United
Kingdom
(No 38644/97)
Decision 24.11.98
[Section III]
Disciplinary fine:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PADIN GESTOSO v.
Spain (No
39519/98)
Decision 8.12.98 [Section IV]
Concept of criminal charge – investigative measures prior to the bringing of
charges: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
WITHEY
v. United Kingdom
(Nº 59493/00)
Decision 26.8.2003 [Section IV]
Court order
leaving charges on file: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
MAILLET v. France (N˚ 45676/99)
Decision 12.11.2002 [Section IV]
Refusal to
admit appeal memorial on account of absence of signature of appellant who had
chosen not to be represented by a lawyer practising before the supreme courts:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PAPON v. France
(N° 54210/00)
Judgment 25.7.2002 [Section I]
Dismissal of
cassation appeal due to appellant’s failure to surrender into custody:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
JANOSEVIC v. Sweden (Nº 34619/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
Enforcement of
tax surcharges prior to court determination of liability:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
VÄSTBERGA TAXI AKTIEBOLAG
and VULIC v. Sweden (Nº 36985/97)
Judgment 23.7.2002 [Section I]
Enforcement of
tax surcharges prior to court determination of liability:
violation.
This judgment deals with the same issue as the
Janosevic judgment, above..
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GÖKTAN v. France (N° 33402/96)
Judgment 2.7.2002 [Section II]
Lack of
competence of judge to assess the length of civil imprisonment for a customs
debt: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
R.D. v. Poland (Nº 29692/96 and Nº 34612/97)
Judgment 18.12.2001 [Section IV]
Refusal to
appoint legal aid lawyer for cassation appeal:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ELIAZER v. the Netherlands
(Nº 38055/97)
Judgment 16.10.2001 [Section I]
Exclusion of
cassation appeal following conviction in absentia in Netherlands
Antilles: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MAUER v. Austria (no. 2) (N˚
35401/97)
Judgment 20.6.2000
[Section III]
Administrative criminal
proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
VAN PELT v.
France
(N° 31070/96)
Judgment 23.5.2000 [Section III]
Dismissal of
cassation appeal due to appellant's failure to comply with arrest warrant:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
J.K. v. Slovakia (N˚ 29021/95)
Judgment 21.3.2000
[Section II]
Absence of
possibility of court review of conviction by administrative authorities for
minor offence: friendly settlement.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
KHALFAOUI v. France
(Nº 34791/97)
Judgment 14.12.99
[Section III]
Dismissal of
cassation appeal due to appellant's failure to surrender into custody:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MILLAN I TORNES v. Andorra
(No 35052/97)
Judgment 6.7.99 [Section I]
Authorisation
of the State prosecution service to initiate appeal proceedings:
settlement
between parties.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MOHR v. Luxembourg
(N° 29236/95)
Decision 20.4.99
[Section II]
Lodging of a
memorial by the applicant's lawyer, mentioning that it concerned the cassation
appeal against the judgment in the applicant's case, but without expressly
stating that it was lodged on behalf of and for the applicant:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
ASSANIDZÉ - Georgia (N° 71503/01)
Judgment 8.4.2004 [Grand Chamber] – Nº 63
Refusal to release detainee following final acquittal :
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
EDWARDS and LEWIS - United Kingdom (Nº
39647/98 and Nº 40461/98)
Judgment 27.10.2004 [Grand Chamber] - Nº 68
Non-disclosure by prosecution, on ground of public interest, of
material potentially relevant to defence of entrapment: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MAKHFI - France (N° 59335/00)
Judgment 19.10.2004 [Section II] - Nº 68
Length of oral pleadings before a criminal court : violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
EUROFINACOM - France (N° 58753/00)
Decision 7.9.2004 [Section II] - Nº 67
Alleged incitement by the police to commit an offence:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
S.C. v. United Kingdom (Nº 60958/00)
Judgment 15.6.2004 [Section IV]
Fitness of an eleven year old boy to plead and stand trial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CORNELIS
v. Netherlands (N°
994/03)
Decision 25.5.2004 [Section II]
Conviction partly based on statements by co-accused who made an arrangement with
the prosecution: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SOMOGYI v. Italy
(N° 67972/01)
Judgment 18.5.2004 [Section II]
Alleged failure to inform accused of proceedings prior to conviction in
absentia: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WEH
v. Austria (N°
38544/97)
Judgment 8.4.2004 [Section I]
Imposition of a fine to a registered car owner who refused to disclose the name
of the person who had driven his car: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SHANNON
v. United
Kingdom (N°
67537/01)
Decision 6.4.2004 [Section IV] – Nº 63
Admission in trial of evidence obtained with entrapment by a journalist:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
JONES
v. United Kingdom
(N° 30900/02)
Decision 9.9.2003 [Section IV]
Trial and
conviction in the absence of the accused and his legal representatives:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SIGURÞÓR ARNARSSON v. Iceland (Nº 44671/98)
Judgment 15.7.2003
[Section II]
Conviction on
appeal by prosecution, on the basis of an assessment of the evidence by the
Supreme Court, without hearing the accused in person:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
EDWARDS and LEWIS v. United Kingdom (Nº 39647/98 and Nº 40461/98)
Judgment 22.7.2003 [Section IV]
Non-disclosure
by prosecution, on ground of public interest, of material potentially relevant
to defence of entrapment: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GARAUDY v. France
(N° 65831/01)
Decision 24.6.2003 [Section IV]
Refusal to join
five parallel sets of proceedings before the same court:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SOFRI and others v. Italy
(Nº 37235/97)
Decision 27.5.2003 [Section IV]
Loss and
destruction of evidence: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SEQUEIRA v. Portugal
(Nº 73557/01)
Decision 6.5.2003
[Section III]
Alleged
incitement by agents provocateurs to commit a crime:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
PERNA v. Italy
(Nº 48898/99)
Judgment 6.5.2003
[Grand Chamber]
Refusal to
admit evidence requested by the accused in a defamation case:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PAPAGEORGIOU v. Greece
(Nº 59506/00)
Judgment 9.5.2003 [Section I]
Refusal to
allow evidence requested by an accused:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SELVANAYAGAM v. United Kingdom
(Nº 57981/00)
Decision 12.12.2002 [Section III]
Refusal to allow plea of defence of reasonable conduct, on account of breach of
injunction: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CRAXI v. Italy (N° 34896/97)
Judgment 5.12.2002
[Section I]
Effect of
press campaign on judges in trial of politician: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ALLAN v. United Kingdom
(Nº 48539/99)
Judgment 5.11.2002 [Section IV]
Self-incrimination – eliciting of confession by police informer placed in
suspect’s cell: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WYNEN v. Belgium
(N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002
[Section II]
–Notification of
Court of Cassation hearing by announcement at its registry:
no violation.
–Refusal of
Court of Cassation to put preliminary question to Court of Arbitration:
no
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BECKLES v. United Kingdom
(Nº 44652/98)
Judgment 8.10.2002 [Section IV]
Drawing of adverse inferences by a jury from accused’s failure to reply to
police questions: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ALLEN v. United Kingdom
(Nº 76574/01)
Decision 10.9.2002 [Section IV]
Self-incrimination: obligation to disclose information to tax authorities:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PERRY v. United Kingdom
(Nº 63737/00)
Decision 26.9.2002
[Section III]
Admission as
evidence in criminal proceedings of video footage taken without accused’s
knowledge or consent: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CHALKLEY v. United Kingdom
(Nº 63831/00)
Decision 26.9.2002
[Section III]
Admission as
evidence in criminal proceedings of evidence obtained through use of a listening
device illegally installed in the suspect’s home:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PARRIS v. Cyprus (N° 56354/00)
Decision 4.7.2002 [Section I]
Conviction for
manslaughter on basis of autopsy carried out illegally:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CALABRO v.
Italy
(N° 59895/00)
Decision 21.3.2002 [Section I]
Undercover
agent who did not incite the commission of the offence, although it would not
have taken place without his intervention: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
OYSTON v. United
Kingdom
(N° 42011/98)
Decision 22.1.2002 [Section IV]
Fresh evidence
adduced by defendant in rape case refused by Court of Appeal:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
TURQUIN v. France
(N° 43467/98)
Decision 24.1.2002 [Section IV]
Use at trial of
private recordings made without the knowledge of the accused:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
C.G. v. the
United Kingdom
(Nº 43373/98)
Judgment 19.12.2001
[Section III]
Frequent
interruptions by judge during trial: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PAPON
v. France (N° 54210/00)
Decision 15.11.2001
[Section III]
–Effects of a
media campaign on the fairness of the jury trial of a former Minister:
inadmissible.
–Absence of
reasons for jury’s verdict in criminal trial: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
EINHORN v. France (N°
71555/01)
Decision 16.10.2001 [Section III]
–Extradition of applicant to the United States, where he claims the members of
the jury which will retry him have been subjected to a virulent media campaign:
inadmissible.
–Extradition of applicant to the United States, where he had been convicted in
absentia, following adoption of a US law allowing for the possibility of
retrial: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
G.B.
v. France
(N° 44069/98)
Judgment 2.10.2001 [Section III]
Refusal of
Court of Assize to order counter-expertise requested by applicant following
expert’s unfavourable change of position:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom
(Nº 44787/98)
Judgment 25.9.2001
[Section III]
–Non-disclosure,
on ground of public interest immunity, of material held by prosecution:
no
violation.
–Use in criminal
trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Convention:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PHILLIPS v. the United Kingdom
(Nº 41087/98)
Judgment 5.7.2001
[Section III]
Confiscation
order based on presumption that assets acquired through drug trafficking:
no
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SAWONIUK v. the United Kingdom
(N° 63716/00)
Decision 29.5.2001
[Section III]
Trial
concerning war crimes taking place fifty years after the events:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
J.B. v. Switzerland
(Nº 31827/96)
Judgment 3.5.2001
[Section II]
Self-incrimination – obligation to submit documents to the tax authorities:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
YANG CHUN JIN alias
YANG XIAOLIN v. Hungary (Nº 58073/00)
Judgment 8.3.2001
[Section II]
Threatened
extradition to China, with alleged risk of summary trial: struck out.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
VAUDELLE v. France
(N° 35683/97)
Judgment 30.1.2001
[Section III]
Conviction
in absentia of accused, placed under supervisory guardianship, without
notification to the guardian and without any legal representation at the
hearing: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HEANEY and McGUINNESS v. Ireland (Nº 34720/97)
QUINN v. Ireland (Nº 36887/97)
Judgments 21.12.2000 [Section IV]
Self-incrimination – conviction for refusing to answer questions asked by the
police: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(HEANEY and
McGUINNESS v. Ireland)
(QUINN v.
Ireland)
I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P. v. United Kingdom (N˚ 29522/95,
30056/96 and 30574/96)
Judgment 19.9.2000
[Section III]
Self-incrimination – use at trial of statements made on pain of a sanction to
inspectors investigating a company takeover:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PULLICINO v.
Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000 [Section II]
–Effect of
extensive adverse media reporting on fairness of trial:
inadmissible.
–Fairness
of proceedings as a whole despite breach of the right to a fair hearing:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
COEME v. Belgium
(Nº 32492/96)
MAZY v. Belgium
(Nº 32547/96)
STALPORT v. Belgium
(Nº 32548/96)
HERMANUS v. Belgium
(Nº 33209/96)
JAVEAU v. Belgium
(Nº 33210/96)
Judgment 22.6.2000
[Section II]
Absence of
legal basis for special procedure: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
AVERILL v.
United Kingdom
(N˚ 36408/97)
Judgment 6.6.2000
[Section III]
Self-incrimination - drawing of adverse inferences from accused’s silence:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
UBACH MORTES v.
Andorra
(N° 46253/99)
Decision 4.5.2000 [Section IV]
Allegations of
unfair proceedings relating to misappropriation of public funds:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CONDRON v. United Kingdom
(N˚ 35718/97)
Judgment 2.5.2000 [Section III]
Self-incrimination - drawing of adverse inferences by a jury:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SERVES v. France
(N° 38642/97)
Decision 4.5.2000
[Section III]
Self-incrimination - reports drafted in disciplinary proceedings used in
subsequent criminal proceedings concerning the same facts:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
NATELITIĆ v. Croatia (N° 51891/99)
Decision 4.5.2000 [Section IV]
Surrender to
the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia of person suspected of
war crimes: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
KHAN v. United Kingdom
(N˚ 35394/97)
Judgment 12.5.2000
[Section III]
Use in criminal
trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Convention:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HASER v. Switzerland
(N° 33050/96)
Decision 27.4.2000
[Section II]
Obligation to
contest a judgment given in default, in order to obtain a judgment in
adversarial proceedings before lodging a cassation appeal:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CAMILLERI
v. Malta (N° 51760/99)
Decision 16.3.2000
[Section II]
Admission in
evidence at trial of adverse statement revoked by witness before the trial:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ROWE and DAVIS v. United
Kingdom
(Nº 28901/95)
FITT v. United Kingdom (Nº 29777/96)
JASPER v. United Kingdom
(Nº 27052/95)
Judgments 16.2.2000
[Grand Chamber]
Non-disclosure
by prosecution on grounds of public interest immunity:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(ROWE and DAVIS
v. United Kingdom)
(FITT v. United
Kingdom)
(JASPER v.
United Kingdom)
T. v. United Kingdom
(Nº 24724/94)
V. v. United
Kingdom
(Nº 24888/94)
Judgments 16.12.99
[Grand Chamber]
Effective
participation of child in trial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(T. v.
United Kingdom)
(V. v. United
Kingdom)
a
RIHA v. France (N°
71443/01)
Decision 24.6.2004 [Section III] - Nº 65
Quashing of appeal judgment by Court of Cassation and giving of final decision
on the case without further pleading:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
DOWSETT v. United Kingdom
(Nº 39482/98)
Judgment 24.6.2003 [Section II]
Non-disclosure
of material by prosecution: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BERGER v.
France
(N° 48221/99)
Judgment
3.12.2002 [Section II]
Non-disclosure to party’s lawyer of report of judge rapporteur at the Court of
Cassation: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WYNEN v. Belgique/Belgium
(N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002
[Section II]
Alleged absence
of opportunity to respond to submissions of public prosecutor:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MEFTAH and others v. France (N°
32911/96)
Judgment 26.7.2002
[Grand Chamber]
Non-communication des
conclusions de l’avocat général près la Cour de cassation et impossibilité d’y
répliquer par écrit : violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
MAKHFI -
France (N° 59335/00)
Judgment 19.10.2004 [Section II] - Nº 68
Length of oral pleadings before a criminal court :
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc (fransk)
MAGNUSSON v. Sweden (Nº 53972/00)
Decision 16.12.2003 [Section IV]
Reliance on
video recording of children’s evidence in conviction for sexual abuse:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WYNEN v. Belgium
(N° 32576/96)
Judgment 5.11.2002
[Section II]
Rejection as
out of time of supplementary memorial lodged by appellant with Court of
Cassation: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ATLAN v. the United Kingdom
(Nº 36533/97)
Judgment 19.6.2001
[Section III]
Non-disclosure
of material by the prosecution: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BEER v. Austria (Nº 30428/96)
Judgment 6.2.2001
[Section III]
Non-communication of appeal in respect of costs:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PULLICINO v. Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000
[Section II]
Confiscation of
notes taken by the defence during the prosecution’s presentation of its case:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
KUOPILA v. Finland (N˚ 27752/95)
Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section IV]
Non-disclosure
to accused of material submitted to court by prosecution:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
VOISINE v. France
(N°27362/65)
Judgment 8.2.2000
[Section III]
Non-communication des
conclusions de l’avocat général près la Cour de cassation :
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
RIEPAN v. Austria (N° 35115/97)
Judgment 15.6.2000
[Section III]
Hearing held in
prison: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
MEFTAH and others
v. France (N°
32911/96)
Judgment 26.7.2002
[Grand Chamber]
Absence of
possibility of addressing Court of Cassation orally at hearing, either
personally or through a lawyer without rights of audience before the supreme
courts: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
TIERCE and others
v. San Marino (N° 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000 [Section I]
Absence of oral
hearing on appeal: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CONSTANTINESCU v.
Romania
(N˚ 28871/95)
Judgment 27.6.2000 [Section I]
Absence of oral
hearing on appeal: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
STEFANELLI v. San-Marino
(N° 35396/97)
Judgment 8.2.2000
[Section II]
Lack of oral
hearing before the trial judge:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
SCHUMACHER
v. Luxembourg
(N° 63286/00)
Judgment 25.11.2003 [Section IV]
Length of
investigation ending in time-bar – dies a quem with regard to the period
to be examined.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WITHEY v. United Kingdom
(Nº 59493/00)
Decision 26.8.2003 [Section IV]
Court order
leaving charges on file: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PEDERSEN and BAADSGAARD v. Denmark
(Nº 49017/99)
Judgment 19.6.2003 [Section I]
Length of
criminal proceedings: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SCHAAL v. Luxembourg (N° 51773/99)
Judgment 18.2.2003 [Section IV]
Length of
criminal proceedings having repercussions on a parent’s right of access to his
child: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ETCHEVESTE and BIDART v.
France (N° 44797/98 and N° 44798/98)
Judgment 21.3.2002 [Section I]
Starting point
of period to be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length
of criminal proceedings.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WEJRUP v. Denmark
(N° 49126/99)
Decision 7.3.2002 [Section I]
Allegedly
excessive length of proceedings concerning fraud, due to the joinder of the
cases against several defendants: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HENDRIKS v. Netherlands
(N° 44829/98)
Decision 5.3.2002
[Section II]
Authorities not
responsible for delays in criminal proceedings having taken place in other
countries in respect of the same facts:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MARTINS and
GARCIA ALVES v. Portugal
(N° 37528/97)
Judgment 16.11.2000 [Section IV]
Starting point
– date of interrogation by police:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
KUDŁA v. Poland
(N˚ 30210/96)
Judgment 26.10.2000 [Grand Chamber]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
WŁOCH v. Poland
(N˚ 27785/95)
Judgment 19.10.2000 [Section IV]
Length of
criminal proceedings – delays attributable to foreign authorities:
no
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GEORGIOS
STRAVORAVDIS v. Greece (N° 45140/98)
Decision 12.10.00 [Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings : inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GRAUSLYS v. Lithuania
(N˚ 36743/97)
Judgment 10.10.2000 [Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
LÖFFLER v. Austria
(N˚ 30546/96)
Judgment 3.10.2000
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings – starting point where proceedings reopened.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HOWARTH v.
United Kingdom
(N˚
38081/97)
Judgment 21.9.2000 [Section IV]
Length of criminal proceedings – delay between original non-custodial sentence
and custodial sentence ordered following reference by Attorney-General:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BERTIN v. MOUROT v. France
(N° 36343/97)
Judgment 2.8.2000
[Section III]
–Length of
criminal proceedings – starting point of the period to be taken into account.
–Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
IKANGA v. France
(N˚ 32675/96)
Judgment 2.8.2000 [Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CHERAKRAK v. France
(N˚ 34075/96)
Judgment 2.8.2000 [Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
P.B. v. France
(N˚ 38781/97)
Judgment 1.8.2000 [Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
C.P. and others v.
France (N°
36009/97)
Judgment 1.8.2000
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BARFUSS v. Czech Republic
(N˚ 35848/97)
Judgment 31.7.2000 [Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MATTOCCIA v. Italy
(N˚ 23969/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000 [Section I]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HANSEN v. Denmark
(N˚ 28971/95)
Judgment 11.7.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GROSSE v. Denmark
(N˚ 30285/96)
Judgment 8.6.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
STARACE v. Italy
(N° 34081/96)
Judgment 27.4.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PEPE v. Italy
(N° 30132/96)
Judgment 27.4.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PUNZELT v. Czech Republic (N˚
31315/96)
Judgment 25.4.2000
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SERGI v. Italy
(N˚ 37118/97)
Judgment 11.4.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
BOCCARDI v. Italy
(N˚ 38045/97)
Judgment 28.3.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MARAZZO v. Italy
(N˚ 41203/98)
Judgment 28.3.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CLOEZ v. France
(Nº 41861/98)
Judgment 14.3.2000
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GALLONI v. Italy
(Nº 39453/98)
Judgment 29.2.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
AGGIATO v. Italy
(Nº 36822/97)
Judgment 29.2.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
GAST and POPP v. Germany
(Nº 29357/95)
Judgment 25.2.2000 [Section I]
Length of Constitutional Court proceedings:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MAJARIC v. Slovenia
(Nº 28400/95)
Judgment 8.2.2000 [Section I]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
AGGA v. Greece
(Nº 37439/97)
Judgment 25.1.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PALMIGIANO v. Italy
(Nº 37507/97)
Judgment 11.1.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MARTINELLI v. Italy
(Nº 33827/96)
Judgment 11.1.2000
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
DE BLASIIS v. Italy
(Nº 33969/96)
Judgment 14.12.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
G.B.Z., L.Z. and S.Z. v. Italy
(Nº 41603/98)
Judgment 14.12.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PENNA
v. Italy
(Nº 35168/97)
MASTROENI v. Italy
(Nº 41041/98)
M.R. v. Italy
(Nº 41892/98)
LOMBARDO v. Italy
(Nº 42353/98)
Judgments 14.12.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(PENNA v. Italy)
(MASTROENI v.
Italy)
(M.R. v. Italy)
(LOMBARDO v.
Italy)
MARCHETTI v. Italy
(Nº 37702/97)
Judgment 14.12.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
GATTO v. Italy
(Nº 34469/97)
IULIANO v. Italy
(Nº 35756/97)
ROSSI v. Italy
(Nº 36148/97)
PASSADORO v. Italy
(Nº 36740/97)
ALI v. Italy
(Nº 37484/97)
ERRIGO v. Italy
(Nº 39789/98)
Judgments 2.11.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(GATTO v. Italy)
(IULIANO v.
Italy)
(ROSSI v. Italy)
(PASSADORO v.
Italy)
(ALI v. Italy)
(ERRIGO v.
Italy)
FRANZIL v. Italy
(Nº 34214/96)
FERRARA and DE LORENZO v. Italy
(Nº 40282/98 and Nº 40283/98)
Judgments 26.10.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(FRANZIL v.
Italy)
(FERRARA and DE
LORENZO v. Italy)
GELLI v. Italy
(Nº 37752/97)
Judgment 19.10.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
G.S. v. Italy
(Nº 34204/96)
EMMOLO v. Italy
(Nº 42500/98)
SCANDELA v. Italy
(Nº 43494/98)
MACCIOCCHI v. Italy (Nº 43584/98)
CARROZZA v. Italy (Nº 43598/98)
Judgments 19.10.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(G.S. v. Italy)
(EMMOLO v.
Italy)
(SCANDELA v.
Italy)
(MACCIOCCHI v.
Italy)
(CARROZZA v.
Italy)
DONSIMONI v. France
(Nº 36754/97)
Judgment 5.10.99
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SCARUFFI v. Italy
(Nº 33455/96)
BAGEDDA and DELOGU v. Italy
(Nº 33992/96)
PESONI v. Italy
(Nº 39694/98)
MANGIOLA v. Italy
(Nº 40179/98)
LA BROCCA and others v. Italy
(Nº 40293/98 and 40295/98)
FRANCESCA v. Italy
(Nº 40665/98)
SILVESTRI and others v. Italy (Nº 41327/98, 41328/98,
41329/98 and/et 41560/98)
Judgments 5.10.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: friendly settlements.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(SCARUFFI v.
Italy)
(BAGEDDA and
DELOGU v. Italy)
(PESONI v.
Italy)
(MANGIOLA v.
Italy)
(LA BROCCA and
others v. Italy)
(FRANCESCA v.
Italy)
(SILVESTRI and
others v. Italy)
DJAID v. France
(Nº 38687/97)
Judgment 29.9.99
[Section III]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
SACCOMANNO v. Italy
(N° 36719/97)
Judgment 12.5.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
LEDONNE (Nº1) v. Italy
(Nº 35742/97)
Judgments 12.5.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
LEDONNE (Nº2) v. Italy (Nº 38414/97)
Judgment 12.5.99
[Section II]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PELISSIER and SASSI v.
France (Nº
25444/94)
Judgment 25.3.99
[Grand Chamber]
Length of
criminal proceedings: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
SADAK and
Others v. Turkey
(Nº 29900/96, Nº 29901/96, Nº 29902/96 and Nº 29903/96)
Judgment 17.7.2001 [Section I]
Independence
and impartiality of State Security Court:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PETERSEN v. Denmark
(N˚ 24989/94)
Judgment 16.11.2000
[Section II]
Independence of
deputy judge of Bailiff's Court: friendly settlement.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
T. v. United
Kingdom
(Nº 24724/94)
V. v. United Kingdom
(Nº 24888/94)
Judgments 16.12.99
[Grand Chamber]
Fixing of
minimum sentence by Executive: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(T. v.
United Kingdom)
(V. v. United
Kingdom)
MOORE and GORDON v. United Kingdom (Nº 36529/97 and Nº 37393/97)
SMITH and
FORD v. United Kingdom
(Nº 37475/97 and Nº 39036/97)
Judgments 29.9.99 [Section III]
Independence
and impartiality of courts-martial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(MOORE and
GORDON v. United Kingdom)
(SMITH and FORD
v. United Kingdom )
GERGER v. Turkey (Nº 24919/94)
KARATAS v. Turkey (Nº 23168/94)
BASKAYA and
OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey (Nº 23536/94 and Nº 24408/94)
OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey (Nº 24246/94)
SÜREK and
ÖZDEMIR v. Turkey (Nº 23927/94 and Nº 24277/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey
(no. 1)
(Nº 26682/95)
SÜREK v. Turkey
(no. 2)
(Nº 24122/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey
(no. 3)
(Nº 24735/94)
SÜREK v. Turkey
(no. 4)
(Nº 24762/94)
Judgments 8.7.99
[Grand Chamber]
National
Security Courts (Turkey): violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(GERGER v. Turkey)
(KARATAS v. Turkey)
(BASKAYA and
OKÇUOGLU v. Turkey)
(OKÇUOGLU v.
Turkey)
(SÜREK and
ÖZDEMIR v. Turkey)
(SÜREK v.
Turkey (no. 1))
(SÜREK v.
Turkey (no. 2))
(SÜREK v.
Turkey (no. 3))
(SÜREK v.
Turkey (no. 4))
CABLE and others v. United Kingdom
(Nos 24436/94, 24582/94, 24583/94, 24584/94, 24895/94, 25937/94,
25939/94, 25940/94, 25941/94, 26271/95, 26525/95, 27341/95, 27342/95, 27346/95,
27357/95, 27389/95, 27409/95, 27760/95, 27762/95, 27772/95, 28009/95, 28790/95,
30236/96, 30239/96, 30276/96, 30277/96, 30460/96, 30461/96, 30462/96, 31399/96,
31400/96, 31434/96, 31899/96, 32024/96, 32944/96)
Judgment 18.2.99
[Grand Chamber]
Independence
and impartiality of courts-martial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
HOOD v. United
Kingdom
(Nº 27267/95)
Judgment18.2.99
[Grand Chamber]
Independence
and impartiality of courts-martial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
CIANETTI v. Italy (Nº 55634/00)
Judgment 22.4.2004 [Section I]
Impartiality of trial judges who had previously participated in an appeal
concerning temporary suspension of the accused from his post:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
DEPIETS v. France
(N° 53971/00)
Judgment 10.2.2004 [Section II]
Judges dealing with appeal on points of law against conviction after having
previously examined an appeal on points of law against the committal for trial:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
KYPRIANOU – Cyprus (N°
73797/01)
Judgment 27.1.2004 [Section II]
Conviction of lawyer for contempt of court by the same court before which the
contempt took place: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
CRAXI v. Italy
(N° 34896/97)
Judgment 5.12.2002 [Section I]
Effect of press campaign on judges in trial of politician:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
LAVENTS v. Latvia (N° 58442/00)
Judgment 28.11.2002 [Section I]
Making of statements in press by judge dealing with case:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
DIDIER v. France
(No 58188/00)
Decision 27.8.2002
[Section II]
Participation
of judge rapporteur in deliberations on the merits:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PEROTE PELLON v. Spain
(N° 45238/99)
Judgment 25.7.2002 [Section IV]
Impartiality of
judges deciding on merits of case after having previously rejected appeals made
by the accused at the investigation stage:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
CRAXI
v. Italy
(N° 63226/00)
Decision 14.6.2001
[Section II]
–Impartiality of
judges having dealt with similar cases: inadmissible.
–Alleged lack of
independence and impartiality of prosecution service: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PRIEBKE v. Italy (N° 48799/99)
Decision 5.4.2001
[Section II]
–Expression of
views by public prosecutor during trial:
inadmissible.
–Participation
by same presiding judge in decision concerning challenge to first instance
judges and in decision on appeal on points of law: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
ROJAS MORALES v. Italy (N° 39676/98)
Judgment 16.11.2000
[Section II]
Conviction by
court including two judges having already participated in a judgment concerning
third parties in which reference was made to the accused's role in the criminal
acts in question: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
DAKTARAS v. Lithuania (Nº
42095/98)
Judgment 10.10.2000
[Section III]
Judge lodging
an appeal and appointing the judges that will decide upon it:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
TIERCE and others v. San Marino
(N˚ 24954/94, 24971/94 et/and 24972/94)
Judgment 25.7.2000 [Section I]
Cumulation of functions –
Commissario della Legge: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
PULLICINO v. Malta (N° 45441/99)
Decision 15.6.2000
[Section II]
Judge presiding
over trial after having previously revoked bail:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GARRIDO GUERRERO
v. Spain
(N° 43715/98)
Decision 2.3.2000 [Section IV]
Impartiality of
judge having previously participated in confirmation of indictment:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MEDENICA v. Switzerland (N° 20491/92)
Decision 16.12.99
[Section II]
Statements by a
member of a jury allegedly casting doubts on his impartiality:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
(fransk)
SANDER v. United Kingdom
(N˚ 34129/96)
Judgment 9.5.2000
[Section III]
Alleged racial
prejudice of jurors: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
NINN-HANSEN v. Denmark (Nº 28972/95)
Decision 18.5.99
[Section II]
Impartiality of
lay judges appointed by Parliament to sit on a court of impeachment:
inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL á
COOPER v. United Kingdom
(N° 48843/99)
Judgment 16.12.2003 [Grand
Chamber]
Independence and impartiality of Air Force court martial:
no violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
GRIEVES v. United Kingdom
(N° 57067/00)
Judgment 16.12.2003
[Grand Chamber]
Independence and impartiality of Navy court martial:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
FILIPPINI v.
San Marino
(N° 10526/02)
Decision 26.8.2003
[Section II]
Appointment of
judges by Parliament: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ÖCALAN
v. Turkey
(N° 46221/99)
Judgment 12.3.2003 [Section I]
Independence
and impartiality of a State Security Court – presence of a military judge
throughout most of the trial: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ABSANDZE v. Georgia (N° 57861/00)
Decision 15.10.2002
[Section II]
Independence of
Supreme Court judges: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
MORRIS v. United
Kingdom
(Nº 38784/97)
Judgment 26.2.2002
[Section III]
Independence
and impartiality of court martial:
violation
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
ŞAHINER v. Turkey
(Nº 29279/95)
ARI v. Turkey
(Nº 29281/95)
YILMAZ v. Turkey
(Nº 29286/95)
KETENOĞLU v. Turkey
(Nº 29360/95 and Nº 29361/95)
YILDIRIM v. Turkey
(Nº 30451/96)
TAMKOÇ v. Turkey
(Nº 31881/96)
YALGIN v. Turkey
(Nº 31892/96)
GÜNEŞ v. Turkey
(Nº 31893/96)
ŞAHIN v. Turkey
(Nº 31961/96)
KIZILÖZ v. Turkey
(Nº 32962/96)
FIKRET DOĞAN v. Turkey
(Nº 33363/96)
YAKIŞ v. Turkey
(Nº 33368/96)
YALGIN and Others v. Turkey
(Nº 33370/96)
Judgments 25.9.2001 [Section I]
Independence
and impartiality of martial law court: violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc:
(ŞAHINER v. Turkey)
(ARI v. Turkey)
(YILMAZ v. Turkey)
(KETENOĞLU v. Turkey)
(YILDIRIM v. Turkey)
(TAMKOÇ v. Turkey)
(YALGIN v. Turkey)
(GÜNEŞ v. Turkey)
(ŞAHIN v. Turkey)
(KIZILÖZ v. Turkey)
(FIKRET DOĞAN v. Turkey)
(YAKIŞ v. Turkey)
(YALGIN and Others v. Turkey)
MORT v. the United Kingdom
(N° 44564/98)
Decision 6.9.2001 [Section IV]
Role played by
Clerk to the Justices in proceedings leading to imprisonment for failure to pay
fine: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a
POSOKHOV v. Russia (Nº 63486/00)
Judgment 4.3.2003
[Section II]
Non-compliance
with rules on participation of lay judges in criminal trials:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
DIDIER
v. France
(No 58188/00)
Decision 27.8.2002
[Section II]
Financial
Markets Board allegedly not a “tribunal”: inadmissible.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
COEME v. Belgium
(Nº 32492/96)
MAZY v. Belgium
(Nº 32547/96)
STALPORT v. Belgium
(Nº 32548/96)
HERMANUS v. Belgium
(Nº 33209/96)
JAVEAU v. Belgium
(Nº 33210/96)
Judgment 22.6.2000 [Section II]
Special
procedure for Ministers before the Court of Cassation applied to others:
violation.
Uoffisielt resyme utarbeidet av EMDs sekretariat
Full tekst fra Hudoc
a